Sunday, October 24, 2010
#40. Paradise Cocktail
#39. The Dutchess Cocktail
#38. B. V. D. Cocktail
#37. After Dinner Cocktail
#36. Daiguiri Cocktail [SIC]
#35. Oppenheim Cocktail
Friday, October 22, 2010
#34. September Morn
Friday, October 15, 2010
Distraction; PUNCH in NYTimes
#33. Blackthorn
#32. Appetizer No. IV
Sunday, October 10, 2010
#31. Millionaire Cocktail 1
#30. Saxon Cocktail
#29. Jackson Cocktail
Caught up!
#28. Champagne Cocktail
#27. Golden Bronx Cocktail
#26. Beauty Spot
Where Were We?
Saturday, August 28, 2010
#24. Mint Mash
#23. Humpty Dumpty Cocktail
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
#22. Brandy Cocktail
Friday, August 20, 2010
#21. Gin Buck
#20. Phoebe Snow
#19. Bourbon Highball
#18. Dixie Cocktail
#17. President Cocktail
Thursday, August 19, 2010
#16. Gin Cocktail
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
#15. Snyder Cocktail
#13.1: Best Homemade copycat of Orange Blossom
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
#8.1 Fluffy Ruffles- Copycat of Little Princess
#14. Bronx Cocktail
#13. Orange Blossom Cocktail
Monday, August 16, 2010
#12. St. Croix Rum Sour
Cruzan is the St. Croix rum of choice at Cocktail Century headquarters, but you could make this with any rum, or possibly gasoline, and not notice much difference. The lemon and lime are so strong that this is pretty foolproof.
This is another drink that, while pretty good, is simply not good enough to compete with various other, less labor-intensive cocktails. For instance, I'd take a dark and stormy (rum & ginger beer) over a St. Croix rum sour every time. And, if you order this at your corner bar, you're likely to get one made with sour mix instead of lemon and lime, and no one wants that, do they?
Sunday, August 15, 2010
#11. Canadian Cocktail
Friday, August 13, 2010
#10. Bill Lyken's Delight
The blue curacao left the drink an unpleasant blue-green that made it look like it was going to taste horrible. Its actual taste didn't do much to change anyone's opinion. The dry vermouth taste dominates, with only the slightest citrus character as competition. I don't know what the point of the cherry was at all.
#9. Absinthe Cocktail
#8. Little Princess
#7. Submarine Cocktail
#6. Appetizer No. 1 / Dubonnet Cocktail
Thursday, August 12, 2010
#5. Bacardi cocktail / Cuban cocktail
You cannot lose with this one. This is probably the way the majority of all rum has been consumed. Some combination of sugar, lime, and sometimes water is the typical way to make Caribbean rum tasty, and it works. No frills. I read all about it in And a Bottle of Rum which is a wonderful book about the history of rum.
There's no reason at all to use Bacardi, of course. I did, but only because Ensslin told me to, and I try to obey the letter of the law and the spirit. I would have rather used the perfectly good (perfectly better, in my opinion) bottle of Cruzan I've got, but that can wait for a recipe that asks for St. Croix rum since that's what it is.
Difford's guide includes a pretty interesting story about this one. Apparently Bacardi ended up suing a bar for not using Bacardi when people asked for a Bacardi cocktail. I'm not convinced it was worth suing over, but I see their point. It does only seem fair that a person get the liquor they ask for. Maybe if Bacardi has lost their lawsuit (they didn't) bartenders would just give us whatever they wanted when we say, "Ketel 1 and tonic, please," and we'd have to watch carefully to make sure we didn't get Cosmonaut or whatever. (I just made up cosmonaut, but I see no evidence that there's already a brand of vodka called Cosmonaut. I CLAIM IT. This will be my vanity vodka brand, ala Ciroc. Only mine will be better, because each bottle will have been FLOWN INTO SPACE. That is the COSMONAUT guarantee!)
Also I'm using simple syrup instead of gum syrup because I'm pretty confident it's the same thing, or near enough. Gum syrup might be a bit sweeter, and it might last longer at room temperature. Whatever. I'm calling simple syrup close enough.
Also, let's have another one of these, yeah?
More Notes on Ingredients:
1. Straightforward, easy to find, and not too expensive. For instance, the juice of half a lemon, or dry gin.
2. Specific, easy to find, and super expensive. (Chartreuse, or absinthe.)
3. Impossible to find, or even understand. What is calisaya, for instance? No idea.
4. Tricky.
Here I include, for instance, Cuban rum. I'm going to go ahead and use Bacardi for every recipe that asks for Cuban rum, even though I don't like it much and it's made in Puerto Rico. During Ensslin's era, I'm reasonably confident that Bacardi was the signature Cuban rum, which explains it getting its own "Bacardi cocktail." (Identical to the "Cuban cocktail.")There may It's no longer Cuban, of course, and I have no idea if it contemporary Bacardi resembles 1916 Bacardi. So, let's not worry too much about it.
Maraschino. There may be a reference to a maraschino cherry in here somewhere, but for the most part, Ensslin calls for various liquid measures of maraschino, never modified by helpful words like "liqueur" or "syrup." There is a liqueur, which I think may be near impossible to find in the US. There is also a syrup ala grenadine, but that just seems to be artificially cherry flavored gunk that interests me little. I may try to make my own (Difford suggests making one's own grenadine by making a syrup out of straight pomegranate juice and sugar, which is apparently what grenadine used to be before slowly being replaced by red corn syrup.) or I may try to get some Italian flavor syrup like you'd make into an Italian soda. I'm not sure.
So complicated! And costly!
UPDATES on some ingredients:
1. Old Tom Gin is available at Rouse's, at least in one variety, and it isn't outrageously priced. It's about a dollar more than most of the nicer London dry gins, like Bombay or Tanqueray. Sigh of relief.
2. Orange bitters. None at Rouse's, which perplexes me. There were lots of other weird flavors of bitters, but no orange. So what to do about that, huh?
3. Curacao. There are various orange liqueurs that a person can grab, but the only curacao at Rouse's (or at least the only thing that goes ahead and calls itself curacao) is Leroux blue curacao. Leroux is one of those weird brands of cheap flavored stuff. I'm not happy about this, particularly, but I went with it. Curacao is used in a number of recipes, but often sparingly, so I'm not terribly concerned. But, I do want to be as accurate as possible.
4. Dubonnet. I know it comes in more than one color, but Rouse's only had the red. Not sure what to do about that, since Ensslin I think never refers to it by color. I think it's kind of like vermouth and comes in red and white both. I seem to recall drinking some white Dubonnet years ago from my corner liquor store in Providence.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
#4. Seventh Regiment Cocktail
This regiment prefers, apparently, a wet martini with lemon rind. Gin to sweet vermouth in a 3 to 2 ratio, and Ensslin calls for two pieces of lemon rind.
This gets into one of my only complaints about Ensslin's book--garnish. I assume that the lemon rind is garnish, as it doesn't make any sense to shake up a drink with lemon rind and then strain it. At least, I don't think it makes sense. Maybe that was Hugo's plan. In any case, his instructions can be more than a bit ambiguous.
This is not a particularly good drink. The sweet vermouth is way too strong and I feel like it overpowers the gin handily. I thought that the lime in the polo cocktail helped smooth things out considerably, but the lemon rind is barely a participant in this drink. It makes my martini glass prettier (this is a lovely looking drink, to be sure) I can barely detect citrus.
This is not a bad mix, to be fair, and I'm sure I'm enjoying it more than I would enjoy gin and dry vermouth in a similar ratio. But, It feels only tolerable. Were I not trying to work my way through this book, I would have much rather had a gin and tonic. The 7th regiment is the sort of simple drink that does not stand up against simpler drinks, and for that reason, is not one I'll be making again anytime soon. It's not bad, just not memorable. Mostly, I just want to know more about this seventh regiment. Seventh regiment of what? And why are they drinking so many martinis?
#2.1 Leap Frog [copycat]
In any case, the Leap Frog is the same as the London Buck, save for the fact that Ensslin calls out El Bart gin by name, rather than simply saying dry gin. I am considering the Leap Frog already drunk.
I understand having a preference for one brand of spirit over another. I do not understand giving the same drink different names when using different brands, though. This is particularly true if the name of the liquor isn't in the name of the drink. A confusing practice, but it cuts down on the total number of recipes I have to follow, so I won't judge Hugo too harshly. Maybe El Bart was giving him a little kickback.
Monday, August 9, 2010
#3. Polo Cocktail
The lime makes a surprising difference. The addition makes the whole thing pleasantly citrusy, like a slightly sour grapefruit. I also find myself thinking of a fruit salad mixed in lime juice. Sour, but also sweet and fruity. I think it's a big improvement over the poorly named perfect cocktail.
I do think this all might be proving my theory that I don't like vermouth, though. I'm not sure if I'm enjoying the combination of lime and vermouth, or if I just like the lime covering up the vermouth. Hard to say but there are plenty of vermouth-heavy recipes left to go, so I may find out yet.
Difford's includes nothing that comes any closer to this recipe than the martini perfect, which has orange bitters instead of lime. I'm going to assume that that's about the only remaining legacy of these two different 1916 equal-parts sweet vermouth, dry vermouth, and dry gin recipes. Probably because I'm not the only one who doesn't rank vermouth as a favorite spirit.
#2: London Buck
The London Buck was actually a little nicer than I anticipated. The lemon, rather than being a garnish, is a full participant in this--Ensslin calls for the juice of half a lemon. The London Buck has a strong lemon scent and aftertaste. At first I thought the gin was overpowered by the ginger ale but it works quite well. The ratio is a bit off, though, I think. Perhaps ice was expensive in 1916, so Ensslin calls for a single cube in a Collins glass. I think filling the glass with ice would be better, both because it would keep the ice from melting as fast, and increase the strength of the gin flavor. I'll try it that way next time.
Not sure if I committed a mortal sin or not, but I went ahead and shook the gin and lemon juice with some ice, then topped off with the ginger ale. The book doesn't say to, but as I was following instructions and only using a single ice cube, I thought it would be nice to chill the gin first. My ginger ale was in the fridge, but my gin was not. I think it worked fine.
Difford has this exact same recipe, only uses the shorter name "Buck." "London Buck" sounds better though. More classy.
Research notes: Gin vs. Gin
There are also--and this is more of a problem--a number of cases in which the ingredients are less than strictly clear, because they are not labelled consistently. Gin, perhaps the most-used spirit in the book, is a particular bit of trickiness. We have references to gin, dry gin, Old Tom Gin, El Bart Gin, English gin, Holland gin, and possibly others I haven't spotted. So. What's it all mean?
Holland gin, at least, I assumed to be a separate spirit, which is correct. It is, by reputation, sweeter than the (here) more prevalent London dry. I hope I'll be able to find a bottle. Initially I assumed that both Old Tom and El Bart were particular makes that Ensslin wanted to suggest.
Old Tom, though, is a style of gin, not a particular product. It is sweeter than dry gin and but drier than Holland gin, and I suspect the most difficult to come by of the three. Difford's includes a small number of drinks that call for Old Tom gin, but Difford never does me the favor of specifying a brand of Old Tom that I might be able to buy. Of course, Difford is based in the UK so he probably has far more gin choices readily available than I.
This still doesn't account for all of Ensslin's notes, though. On page 16 is the Fifty-Fifty cocktail, half "dry gin" and half "French vermouth." (Ensslin uses "French" to designate dry vermouth.) On page 17 is the Gibson cocktail, half "gin" and half "French vermouth."
So what am I supposed to do about that, Hugo Ensslin? Either "dry gin" and "gin" aren't the same thing, or Ensslin is padding out his book with multiple names for the same drink. Or, it's a simple editing error, in which case I'm pretty much out of luck.
The Gibson is widely used today to refer to a subtle martini variant--a martini with cocktail onions instead of olives. Assuming that Ensslin's Gibson has some connection to what we now think of as the Gibson, I have a hard time imagining that the gin in his Gibson ought to be anything other than dry.
Hence, I can only assume that these cocktails were offered different names by Ensslin because he says that the Fifty-Fifty is to be stirred, and then Gibson is to be shaken. Truly, we are dealing with a sophisticated science if that subtle a variation is enough to distinguish two drinks from each other.
For now, I'm going to deal with this by assuming that there are three kinds of gin that Hugo wanted me to use--London dry, Old Tom, and Holland. Anytime Old Tom or Holland are not listed, I'm going to assume any reasonably nice London dry will be acceptable. I'll hold off on the recipes that call for Old Tom for now, until I either find a bottle, or decide that it's too difficult to come by.
Sunday, August 8, 2010
#1. The Perfect Cocktail
Notes on Ingredients
Why "Recipes for Mixed Drinks"?
Why drink all these drinks?
Why drink every cocktail in a 1909 bar manual? Why not drink every cocktail in a 1909 bar manual? That’s just as good a question. Or, even better, “Why just drink Miller High Life all the time?” “Why do anything at all?”
It is possible that we are all destined to assume that our era is the least glamorous of all. I can easily imagine hipsters in 1909 yearning for the New York of the 1890s, before it sold out and stopped being cool.
The 2000s, though, were pretty bleak. Politics were an unmitigated disaster through the Bush years, and while the Obama era promised a respite, hope and change quickly began to feel like more of the same.
I think this is a partial explanation for the resurgence in all things quaint. It seems as though as social conditions more and more resemble the Great Depression, our entertainment conditions do, too. New Orleans, at the very least, has retro cocktail bars and burlesque shows sprouting up like mushrooms. I expect this is a particular trend of escapism--let’s live anytime at all besides this one.
The cocktail trend is also part of broader currents within our eating and drinking habits. Just as health, taste, and environmental concerns drive more people to an interest in locally produced foods, a similar impulse is driving a desire for handcrafted beverages. Yes, it’s nice to know that I can show up almost anywhere and cold, familiar Budweiser will be available to me, but isn’t it nicer to drink something carefully prepared for you, with style and personality?
Cocktail culture is also a sort of last-refuge for booze snobs, so its development was probably inevitable. My father was part of a wave of expansion of the American wine industry, vinting in southern Oregon in the 70s and 80s. Shortly thereafter was a huge expansion in microbrews and craft beers. Having only been drinking myself for about a decade (and for most of that, strictly as an amateur), there were doubtless plenty of trends that passed me by. But, cocktails became particularly flashy in the 90s. Every restaurant and bar in New England, where I went to college, tried to cultivate an aura of “hip” by featuring signature martinis. None of these drinks were martinis in the classic sense--they were fruity, vodka-based elixirs served chilled in a martini glass. I think this era at least let people acclimate to the idea of cocktails more complicated than the party-standard “something and something” drinks we all swilled in college dorms.
I think the current trend toward looking to what folks were drinking a century or more ago is much more exciting. I like the sense of continuity with an older era. I also enjoy any trend that seeks to pull back some aspect of human life from the realm of mass production and back into the world of craft. I’d like to be part of that, if only in a small way. I’m not sure that I’ll develop any particular insight or understanding of our forebears, but I do know I’ll be drinking a lot of interesting drinks, and that is itself a worthy purpose.